A Flat Tax Is Progressive

"Any flat tax calibrated to earnings from labor and capital will necessarily redistribute income to the less well off, because an individual’s share from standard public services, such as access to public highways, does not increase proportionate to his income."

   Jay Epstein at Hoover.org 

 The rest of the article is pretty good.  A head tax is regressive because the same charge to rich and poor takes more of the poor's wealth away.  A flat tax targets those who are better off.  And even a fair tax can be corrupted by politicians if they take too much cream off the milk.  At least it reduces perverse incentives and any increase in tax will come out of the pols pockets too.

Remember, all those loopholes in tax law are a feature, not a bug, giving lawmakers the power to distribute favours to lobbies.

Waste is essential when your time is short.

Waste and death are necessary to renew the bodies politic, and familiar. The church of the three R's (reduce, re-use, recycle) wants to hang onto what we have in this life but has no doctrine of heaven or hell.  If we soon find a way to put off death entirely, it will be to protect the wealth and world-view of aged women and men, not to usher in a golden age.

Death is a great waster, throwing away property, wisdom, experience, networks, character and beauty. It's left to mewling and puking babes to start over and renew everything in a few decades, and it works.  With my mom's passing went encyclopaedic knowledge of plant taxonomy in the Ottawa Valley and pick-your-own wild blueberry pie parties.  Dad departed with the genealogy of several hundred years
and radioactive tracer knowhow about the ADP-ATP energy packing molecule.  The flight from death is behind the multitudinous rules to eliminate risk from the playground, the supermarket, and in fact from everywhere.

Energy should be used liberally wherever abundant.  That means waste it, floor the pedal, dump the excess, enjoy it.   Remember e=mc2.     The bomb on Hiroshima released as much energy as is bound in a single blob of snot.  There is no shortage of energy, and never has been, or will be.  Reducing, Re-using and Re-cycling is a patchwork policy until access to abundant energy is improved.  Think cold fusion with a box buried in the back yard that can run your town for a hundred years.

New Yorker

Since I"m involved with the housing industry, I see a lot of plans including one this week for an expensive  cottage with triple exterior walls.  People are afraid to waste energy and go to great expense avoiding it.  They won't be getting that money back.   For half a million dollars, childless couples build 2500 square foot houses with R40 insulation values while old timers in the Chilcotin would leave the door of their two room un-insulated cabin open in winter because the wood stove was making them sweat.

Hindu belief has Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva  - Creator/Sustainer/Destroyer.  You've seen statues of the Kali version of the latter, ugly with many arms and the heads of its victims dangling. The three aspects of life are always present.  Our p.c. culture has been retreating onto an island of sustainability, nursing scarce resources, while outlawing risk and danger. Creativity and renewal through destruction of the old come from off island.

Faced with an abundance of stuff and a shortage of time, you must waste stuff to get value from your time.

U.S.Governed by Dead Men

Author P.K. Howard writes:

America is now run by dead people—by political leaders from the past who enacted mandatory programs that churn ahead regardless of waste, irrelevance, or new priorities.

Rules have replaced leadership in America. ... Nobody asks, “What’s the right thing to do here?” Instead, they wonder, “What does the rule book say?”

Public paralysis is the inevitable result of the steady accretion of detailed rules.

From the forward to The Rule Of Nobody.
Related:
Clear law is the ruin of a nation.
Obsession with writing excessively detailed laws had made it impossible for real people to get anything done".

Give us rule of law but with renewal, not accretion.

Bring back disorganized sports

I was stunned at this plea for cash at Canadian Tire.   Two out of three families actually send their kids to organized sports.  What's wrong with everybody?

We grew up playing disorganized sports.  Football with about three to the side.  500 with a bat and ball in the middle of the street.  Hide and seek in the bushes and garage.  Tree climbing.  Forts in trees, forts underground, igloos made of drifted snow chunks.  All this was built using unofficially borrowed shovels, axes and matches to light candles.  Hikes upriver on the frozen ice, miles from parental scrutiny, and back with frostbitten toes. We took off after breakfast with terse remarks like "I"m going fishing to Rocky" and weren't seen for hours.  I still regret the time I knocked out power to some cottages when the tree for my new log cabin hung up on a second tree and then a third tree before breaking loose in a cascade of sparks onto the power line.  This is normal.  I knew of a couple kids who played on a hockey team but never saw the inside of an arena.

There was the copper wire across the road and through the neighbours trees so Alan and I could talk in morse code when our parents thought we were asleep.  And the time the cops stopped us cycling in our pajamas on the way back from a midnight dew worm hunt.

This week I talked to a guy about twenty years older than me.  He and his buddies got into a coal mine near Lethbridge on weekends, got helmets with lamps and rode coal carts into the mine, taking hay with them to feed the ponies underground.  Other times they crossed the half mile long railway trestle, hiding inside the beams if they misjudged the next train.

This thirst for organized sports puts parents forever in control of their kids,  The kids deserve better. Bring back disorganized sport.

Misbehaving spouses in power: Left and Right differ.

Corrupt people are not particularly drawn to politics and high position.  Power itself creates corruption. Once there, something decent is often turned off in the brain.  I'm tired of reading about leaders who cheat on their spouses.  The Americans have had a few pretty straight guys in power like Bushes, Nixon, Reagan and perhaps Obama but even Ford, Eisenhower and Roosevelt had their sidelines.   Clinton, Johnson, and the Kennedys are a sad self-excusing lot.  Somehow more left than right politicians seem to excuse their infidelity.  Is it situational ethics versus principle?

Some references:
Here
Here
Here
There's a report that Reagan had a short fling with Elizabeth Taylor before his presidenting days. If you keep reading, you'll find eventually find a rumour about everyone.

And a Clinton sex joke:

Clinton and the Pope died on the same day and, due to some administrative foul up, Clinton gets sent to heaven and the Pope gets sent to hell.

The Pope explains the situation to the hell administration, they check their paperwork, and the error is acknowledged. They explain, however, that it will take about 24 hours to make the switch. The next day, the Pope is called in and the hell administration bids him farewell and he heads for heaven.

On the way up, he meets Clinton on the way down, and they stop to chat.

Pope: Sorry about the mix up.

Clinton: No problem.

Pope: Well, I'm really excited about going to heaven.

Clinton: Why's that?

Pope: All my life I've wanted to meet the Virgin Mary.

Clinton: You're a day late.

RCMP ordered to keep fur hats

The RCMP runs on law not opinion.  Leona Aglukkaq, the environment minister, is right to tell them to set aside the talking points of the Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals and keep those warm muskrat hats.

If the hats don't work properly, change them.  If they work properly, wear them proudly.   (Story at National Post)

Control power by controlling sex.

Margaret Wente

"Sixty years ago, sexual behaviour among the young caused deep alarm among the puritanical religious right. Today, it causes deep alarm among the puritanical progressive left. Like their forebears, they are doing their best to restrict and regulate it."

Read more about lefty campus puritans at the G&M link.

Plants recruit animals to do their bidding

If the plant kingdom is below the animal kingdom, how come plants use us to get about, to reproduce, and even to defend themselves?   While our reproductive organs are just interesting to other homo sapiens, plants advertise to alien species.  They have tarted up their reproductive organs to be eaten by mammals and bug-licked for nectar,  They gum their organs to the fur and socks of the lords of field and forest and hitch rides in the nutritious guts of their hosts en route to new property when pooped out.  If they're so dumb, how come we work for them?

Strawberry seducing mammal
for reproductive purposes.

Now Science Daily News reports that the fresh-mown grass smell is part of a plant's alarm system. When a plant is under attack, it emits that smell to signal parasitic wasps that juicy caterpillars are on offer.  "Green leaf volatiles" and "jasmonic acid" are the smells released when something starts cutting and eating the plant. Maize (with and without the ability to release the chemical scents) was used for the test.

Clear law is the ruin of a nation.

"Obsession with writing excessively detailed laws had made it impossible for real people to get anything done".  (This is a feature, not a bug for those politicians whose power and wealth come from writing loopholes in the obstacles they create. km)  

Phillip Howard     
writes trenchantly in The  Atlantic:

"Modern government is organized on “clear law,”the false premise that by making laws detailed enough to take in all possible circumstances, we can avoid human error. .... Law has gotten ever more granular. But all that regulatory detail, like sediment in a harbor, makes it hard to get anywhere. The 1956 Interstate Highway Act was 29 pages and succeeded in getting 41,000 miles of roads built by 1970. The 2012 transportation bill was 584 pages.

Modern law is too dense to be knowable. “It will be of little avail to the people,” James Madison observed, “if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.” The quest for “clear law” is futile also because most regulatory language is inherently ambiguous. Dense rulebooks do not avoid disputes—they just divert the dispute to the parsing of legal words. 

"Nursing homes, day-care centers....(have) a maze of input-oriented regulations. “Food shall be stored not less than 15 cm above the floor”; “there shall be .09 recreational workers per resident”—about a thousand rules in most states for nursing homes.  Australia ...in the wake of scandalous revelations of poor nursing homes ... abandoned the thick rule book and replaced it with 31 general principles, for example to provide “a homelike environment” and to honor residents’ “privacy and dignity.” The result was an almost immediate transformation for the better.

Principles, ironically, are less susceptible to abuse of state power and gamesmanship than precise rules. One of the many paradoxes of “clear law” is that no one can comply with thousands of rules. With principles, a citizen can stand his ground to an unreasonable demand."

He also writes: "Shackling public choices with ironclad rules...dictating correctness in advance supplants human responsibility. ("Nothing that's good works by itself".) Responsibility is nowhere in modern government. Who’s responsible for the budget deficits? Nobody: Program budgets are set in legal concrete. Who’s responsible for failing to fix America’s decrepit infrastructure? Nobody."

He recognizes some rules need to be prescriptive but calls for principle and good judgement as the first face of the law.

Note: Howard's reference to Australia sounds appealing but a quick Google search didn't find it.  The link to his name at the top of the page points to his career and data..

I wish Putin was a bigger man. Canada's air space would be safer.

Publicity shots show him looking like Tarzan.

Scaled pictures show he is a bit of a shortcake.



A shot of growth hormone might have saved us recent indignities:  Air intrusions over Canada,          Finland,  America,  threats that he could have Russian troops in Kiev, Warsaw and Bucharest within two days,  his actual invasion of Ukraine and his unveiled boast: “I want to remind you that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers.”

Will Lefties Ever See Sense?

Never.  This Hydra has many heads - one "biggies"government to get a p.c. solution to every problem - one is telling you how to recycle - others shut all doors free men would walk through.  It's an unstoppable impulse to tell the new neighbours how to behave and to layer zoning and bylaws over the freedom to make deals.  You're not going to persuade vegetarians who believe no fluffy thing should ever be killed to cheer for rib-eye lovers.  You won't get the folks who banned guns from next suspending school kids who point a finger and say "bang".  Regulatory creep is our nature and our fate.   It's coming down the pipeline and even your close friends who mock political correctness, are agonizing over splitting junk into paper, cardboard, metals, plastics, and two kinds of compostables, worried someone will report them for shredding styrofoam and hiding it in a bag of refuse.  The market will look after this if allowed.  In fifty years the few descendants of these same PC people will be making up rules to restrict the "greedy capitalists" who will buy all the landfills in America to make millions putting garbage in one end of a machine while copper, oil, wood fibre, and potting soil pour out the other.

It's our nature to mind other people's business.  The fire of liberty, the fire of innovation and commerce is blanketed by our other nature, which is to put out fires.

"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as “bad luck.” "  (A quote from Heinlein, via Instapundit).

Change arrives nonetheless.  A couple hundred years of Chinese ascendency with harsh rulers and smartphones may be in the offing.

"The Scots Kingdom was Europe's Afghanistan"

Niall Ferguson writing in the Telegraph:

"Scottish history offers proof that even the most failed state can be fixed – by uniting with a richer and more tranquil neighbour. For most of the early modern period, the Scots kingdom was Europe’s Afghanistan. In the Highlands and the Hebrides, feudal warlords ruled over an utterly impoverished populace in conditions of lawlessness and internecine clan conflict.  

"Another Scotland has sprung up. ...What did history have to do with Scotland’s future as a new Scandinavian-style haven for egalitarianism, inclusiveness, clean energy, world peace and all the other things implicitly repudiated by the gimlet-eyed Tory bampots?"

Lots to chew over on voting day.
Politically this is a lefty operation with a dose of deep brain territoriality.
The upside would be Tories ascendant in Westminster.
Not that we love them so much.

Cameron Eloquent For A United Kingdom

This is leadership, Cameron's plea to save the UK puts himself second and Scots first.

"So this is our message to the people of Scotland. We want you to stay. Head and heart and soul, we want you to stay. Please: don’t mix up the temporary and the permanent.
"Don’t think: I’m frustrated with politics right now, so I’ll walk out the door and never come back.  "If you don’t like me – I won’t be here forever. If you don’t like this Government – it won’t last forever. But if you leave the UK – that will be forever".

Is no one coming to Obama's party? UN Climate Theatre Flopping

Obama is to address the UN September 23rd to save the world from climate.  Embarrassingly, "Thanks but no thanks" notes are piling up from world leaders.
As reported by "Watts Up With That":

The Canadian PM sends his regrets.
The presidents of both China and of India
  couldn't clear their calendars.
The Australian PM had a previous commitment.
The German president is taking a rain cheque.

Scottish referendum with surprise consequences.

My accountant son, visiting from Scotland, had a couple observations about the referendum that surprised me.

Pensions after a separation will be a net positive because Scots die on average younger than other Brits.  Not all payroll deductions for pensions will have to be paid out or else Scotland can afford to keep the retirement age at 65 while the rest of the island goes to 67.

Another surprise is university education.  "Uni" is free for all Scots and this was extended to all EU students but with one big exception.  The English don't get it.  If there is separation, the English will then become full-status EU and a flood of students will have to be admitted free to Scottish universities. Don't expect that one to fly.

There are more than 200 national bodies that will have to have their databases divorced. This is the equivalent of Y2K for accountants, potentially an enormous windfall.

Bickering between England and Scotland is nothing new:

Don't forget  verse five of God Save the Queen:
"May he sedition hush
And like a torrent rush

Rebellious Scots to Crush (Battle of Culloden)

Rebellious Scots to crush.
God Save the King."

And up past Hadrian's wall that was built to keep the barbarians at bay, they like to sing "The Flower of Scotland" at sporting events for an anthem:
"But we can still rise now,
And be the nation again,
That stood against him,
Proud Edward's Army,
And sent him homeward,
Tae think again."

  (The Battle of Bannockburn was exactly 700 years ago in 1314, when Robert Bruce sent King Edward II packing.)  As I mentioned once earlier, my dear,late, and gentle grandmother from Nairn harboured hard feelings towards the English and the allegedly traitorous Campbells who drove Bonnie Prince Charlie away. That too was centuries ago.

The enemy is someone who is willing to die in order to kill you.

Head chopping barbarians remind me what real enemies do.  Fake enemies  disagree about cupcakes in school lunches and pipeline rights-of-way, stuff like that.  "While it is true that the Enemy always hates us for a reason — it is his reason, and not our's.   The quote below is borrowed from Instapundit from Harris's "Civiilization And Its Enemies":

"Forgetfulness occurs when those who have been long inured to civilized order can no longer remember a time in which they had to wonder whether their crops would grow to maturity without being stolen or their children sold into slavery by a victorious foe.
…
They forget that in time of danger, in the face of the Enemy, they must trust and confide in each other, or perish.
They forget, in short, that there has ever been a category of human experience called the Enemy. And that, before 9/11, was what had happened to us. The very concept of the Enemy had been banished from our moral and political vocabulary. An enemy was just a friend we hadn’t done enough for — yet. Or perhaps there had been a misunderstanding, or an oversight on our part — something that we could correct. And this means that that our first task is that we must try to grasp what the concept of the Enemy really means.
The Enemy is someone who is willing to die in order to kill you. And while it is true that the Enemy always hates us for a reason — it is his reason, and not ours".

And for dessert, this thought from Ace of Spades HQ:.

Do the world's Muslims want their contribution and legacy to the 21st century to be murder and rape?  That question does not call for collective punishment. However, it does leave open the question of whether or not Muslims should feel ashamed for the murderous impulses many of their coreligionists feel.

Obama the JV player

Powerline says Obama is the JV player who put on a big league sweater and thought he was Kobe Bryant.  Everybody is piling onto the dude in the president's chair.  Now it's original to find something true and praiseworthy about Barack.  I know of two.   He and his wife are sometimes courteous to the secret service guards.  (Not everybody is).   He quietly redirected attention to Pacific alliances in the last year when no crisis was in the news.

Dress up and be someone new.

Jack the Ripper: DNA Gotcha

DNA has almost certainly identified the killer.  In 2007, Russell Edwards bought a bloodied auctioned shawl taken from one of the Ripper's victims and had it scanned for DNA.  The shawl was more expensive than Catherine Eddowes probably could have afforded and raised the possibility that the killer had handled it.  

The unfortunate Ms Eddowes left 126 year old traces but so did Aaron Kosminski, the chief original suspect.  The researchers went to descendents of  Eddowes and Kosminski and found a perfect match for both.  The little lights came on with the Kosminski genes, blinking at the 95% confidence level.  This could collapse an entire publishing industry.
The story broke first at The Daily Mail.

Frequent strikes pave the Dodo road. Hello BCTF

You can predict teacher's unions will be left behind by history because of their strike behaviour.
From comments at smalldeadanimals.com, Big Momma writes:

"It has been my observation over the years, that when a group starts to strike often, then that profession is going the way of the dinosaur. Drywall was invented in the late 50's because of all the strikes by the plasterers - anyone can install drywall (a bit more skill is needed to install on ceilings). Again, there were many strikes by the milkmen in the early 60's - we now buy our eggs and milk in the grocery store, no more home deliveries.
The teachers in the public school seem to strike ever 3 or 4 years in all of the provinces. It is my belief that more parents will be sending their children to private or charter schools and sucking up the extra expense, so that they will not have to deal with this nonsense and be held to ransom all the time. OT, I also think that Canada Post will be a much smaller presence in 10 years, again because of all the strikes. With the last strike in 2012, I had all my bills delivered on-line and I pay them on-line. Enough with all this nonsense!"

A-bomb in Hicksville looking good to Putin

Putin's appealing choice is to drop a nuclear bomb in a strategic Hicksville where NATO will take less note.    Last week he said:"Russia is one of the most powerful nuclear nations. This is a reality, not just words." Fifteen days earlier, on Aug. 14, at a conference in Yalta, the Russian president had told the assembled factions of the State Duma that he soon planned to "surprise the West with our new developments in offensive nuclear weapons about which we do not talk yet.


Foreignpolicy.com spells out the choice. Call it quits in Ukraine and look weak.  Go for broke and be beat when the big powers pitch in.  Or gain empire and win Russian popularity by throwing a bomb in some backwater where the powers dither about the provocation.  How about a nice little plebiscite in a corner of Estonia to join Mother Russia?  Do you think NATO or the US would step up to the plate if the battlefield was small enough and far enough away from Washington, London and Paris?

Estonia is no Hicksville but to snobs in the financial capitals, it doesn't rate.